Monday, March 28, 2005

Albert Einstein

Physics is just an explanation or theorization of the natural phenomenon. There is nothing strange about it when explained. But when any theory in physics was first discovered, no one but the mad scientist himself knew what it was all about. Newton and Einstein were like that at their time. But their theories are understood by many today, and thus entered the university curricula.

Many physicists discovered something important from time to time. But some fantastic physicists would suddenly struck by lightning, or an Act of God, and discovered many wonderful things within a very short time. Annus mirabilis, the miracle year, was first used to describe Isaac Newton in 1665-66, when he developed the theory of Calculus, gravitation and the colour spectrum.

1905 was the annus mirabilis for Einstein, when he published five scientific papers, one as his doctoral thesis and four in Annalen Der Physik. All of them are important theories which have great impact to the development of physics. Now the name Einstein is synonymous to physics, and everyone talk about his theory of relativity and the atomic bomb. Actually his achievement goes much beyond that. Relativity, or rather the unified theory of relativity, is the thing he tried but could not accomplished.

It is now the year 2005. To celebrate the centennial of Einstein's miracle year, physics societies around the world have declared 2005 as the World Year of Physics. This is followed by the UN declaring 2005 as the International Year of Physics. The launching of the year took place at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris during 13-15 January.

These are the five papers published by Einstein in 1905.

On a new determination of molecular dimensions
This is his doctoral thesis. By considering a collection of sugar molecules dissolved in a glass of water, Einstein derived a mathematical term that measured the speed of diffusion. It was then possible to elicit the size of the sugar molecules by contemplating the diffusion coefficient and the viscosity of the solution.

On the Motion of Small Particles Suspended in a Stationary Liquid
Following his study of Brownian motion and using the then-controversial kinetic theory of fluids, he established that the phenomenon provided empirical evidence for the reality of atoms. It also led to the advance of statistical mechanics.

On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light
This is the paper which led to the award of the Nobel Prize. He proposed the idea of photons and showed how it could be used to explain the photoelectric effect. The idea was motivated by the law of black-body radiation by assuming that luminous energy could only be absorbed or emitted in discrete amounts, called quanta. This led to the development of quantum mechanics.

On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies
This is the famous theory of Special relativity. The whole new thinking about moving bodies supplemented, but not overturned, Newton's laws of motion. The idea of time being a dimension triggered a good topic for many science fictions.

Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?
This paper showed a deduction from relativity's axioms and introduced the equation E=MCsquared. Einstein considered this equation to be of paramount importance because it showed that a massive particle possesses an energy, the "rest energy", distinct from its classical kinetic and potential energy. The mass-energy relation can be used to predict how much energy will be released or consumed by chemical and nuclear reactions.

Many people consider that Einstein had supernatural power, or was influenced by alien beings. Actually he was a normal human being, just more clever than us, and had his down time and mistakes. In 1916, he published the paper on general relativity which was an extension on relativity and took into account the effects of acceleration, including the most common acceleration, gravity. The achievement was so great and Einstein was so ambitious that he went on and spent the rest of his life on a unified theory of relativity which could explain all things. He was unsuccessful. However, the quest has motivated many physicists and there are now many who are still working in this direction. Seen in this light, his theory was not overturned, but supplemented and respected by those following.

Einstein was a skeptic of quantum mechanics. It is ironic that his paper on photon emission was a great step in this area. He could not accept the probabilistic, non-visualizable account of physical behavior which was the basis of quantum physics, but looked for a more complete and deterministic explanation.

In 1926, he made a remark that is now famous: "The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the Old One. I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice." To this, Niels Bohr, who sparred with Einstein on quantum theory retorted, "Stop telling God what He must do!" The Bohr and Einstein debate on quantum mechanics, the exchange of letters between them, now became the greatest literature on scientific debate of the 20th century.

I subscribed Scientific American. Last year, it dedicated a whole issue to Einstein. There is a good article from the magazine. Those interested may ask me for a copy directly.

Thursday, March 24, 2005

Digital photography

A friend said Erwin Puts' recent article on Respect on the Image at the following link is worth reading: http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c006.html

He also said "From my own experience, the casual attitude that one adopts in taking digital photos does degrade the photographic process somewhat. When you can take as many pictures as you like at no extra cost and knowing that you can do so much post-processing with Photoshop, you tend to take less care in framing the image and making sure that the camera settings are correct. With time, you will forget what it is like to make a perfect photo in one take. The creative spirit and respect for the subject matter will be gone. Such is the price we have to pay as we dive into the digital imaginary world, I'm sorry to say."

This is an interesting viewpoint. We see it almost in every change management cases. There are always something to treasure of an outgoing technology or practice. The beauty of film photography will stay forever, but will live another live, in a more artistic rather than technical arena.

The convenience of digital photography, thus leading to a casual attitude in camera setting, is only partly true. What is the cost of an extra negative? I notice that there are many professional photographers shooting one scene with a lot of films, at various angles and with various settings. The permutation of aperture/shutter is limitless and even professionals have to engage the trial and error method. On the other hand, the advance of digital photography has brought much improvement to image making. The process is an integrated one, from camera setting and shooting to post processing, cropping, colour adjustment, etc., all for the ultimate purpose of a perfect image. There is no one single step that is more important than others. At the top, there is still the artistic taste of human that makes the difference.

Erwin Puts is quite right in pointing out that the potential of digital photography lies beyond making an image. His observation of the camera-phone is correct that photo-taking will become a daily event instead of a photographic event. Nowadays, people compose photo diary and record things they do, for the purpose of keeping history, memory, journal etc. Blogs are now full of daily images. Content and convenience are king, not a perfectly calibrated photograph.

As digital photography getting more powerful, film photography will be upgraded to the professional niche, just like black vinyl discs or vacuum tube amplifiers.

Back to the natural phenomenon of change management, there are several examples.

When the ball pen was invented, people said it would affect the ability to write properly and refrain from letting children use them. Now ball pens are everyday tool and the ink brush is used in the fine art of calligraphy.

When the piano was invented, people said it did not have the elegance of the harpsichord which could produce clearer sound. Now the piano is the basis of music making and the harpsichord is only used to play Baroque classics.

When automobile was invented, people said it was too dangerous and did not provide the leisure of riding in a horse carriage. Now we cannot do without automobile, and horses can only be found in Happy Valley.

Sunday, March 20, 2005

Flower Show

終於到花展一遊,天氣不錯,略有陽光,但我卻沒有帶相機,對著人工堆砌的植物,總是提不起勁拍照。不過環顧四周,名貴相機可真不少,Canon 1Ds都看見幾架。看著各種插在人工土堆或花盆的植物,有遊覽動物園的感覺;尤其是插花藝術展,活生生的植物都被肢解。我們一向認為植物是次等生物,不過植物亦可能同樣看我們;因為動物連最基本的太陽能也不懂得用,而植物很久很久以前已使用光合作用。

今天早上探訪真正生活的植物,感覺它們快樂得多;請看看幾幅快照。




Monday, March 14, 2005

BookFes 灣仔書節

昨天往灣仔書節一遊,感覺氣氛十分熱鬧。人很多,大人小孩都興高采烈。我覺得這個較貼近群眾的安排比在會展舉行的書展還要好;不需入場費,不用排隊,二三十個展覽商,可以花一兩個小時,精神體力尚可支持。書種很多,香港書、大陸書、台灣書、英文書都有,不過沒有其他外文書。請看以下熱鬧場面。




短短一遊,我買的書比在書展買的還要多。和書展一樣,書商散貨,我們買平書。買了印刷精美的畫冊和歷史書,又找到老夫子再發行版本,連光碟。




書節還有很多節目,這個小女孩在朗誦她讀過的故事書。




我相信書節會在各區舉行。灣仔書節遺憾的是地點太熱鬧了。鄰近是花展,我卻連維多利亞公園也擠不進。遊花展要再等兩天,希望會有陽光。最慘是賓妹和賣手電服務和寬頻上網的人,所有地盤都沒有了,全部人等都要擠在公園和皇室行中間的小小空間。